Method
How we read the terms
Six rules by which every cell on this site is filled or left blank — and their declared limits, so the reader knows what was not done here.
Four things taken from ten operators' own documents: the jurisdiction and number of the licence, the amount above which the terms start talking about identity verification, the declared withdrawal limit, and the company in whose name the site runs. Every figure carries the clause number it came from. A blank cell means we did not read that information — not that the value is zero and not that there is no limit. None of these licences is an Indian permission; no such permission exists in India at all.
- VaveOur partner · Advertisement
-
- LicenceWe did not read this
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- CryptocurrenciesWe did not read this
- CompanyWe did not read this
- Rocketpot
-
- LicenceCuracao
- Stated verification amountUS$2,500
- Withdrawal limit5,000 USD per month clause 11.5
- Cryptocurrencies13
- CompanyDanneskjold Ventures B.V.
- Bitcasino.io
-
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Stated verification amount2,500 EUR
- Withdrawal limit10,00,000 USDT per week clause 6.10
- CryptocurrenciesWe did not read this
- CompanyMoon Technologies B.V.
- Wild Fortune
-
- LicenceAnjouan Gaming Board
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limit15,000 EUR per month clause 11.8
- Cryptocurrencies10
- CompanyMetlait SRL
- DuckDice
-
- LicenceAnjouan Gaming Board
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- Cryptocurrencies10
- CompanyZentari Limitada
- Empire.io
-
- LicenceAnjouan Gaming Board
- Stated verification amount2,000 USDT
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- CryptocurrenciesWe did not read this
- CompanyPixel Entertainment Limited
- Metaspins
-
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- Cryptocurrencies8
- Company3-102-959384 SRL
- Rainbet
-
- LicenceAnjouan Gaming Board
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- Cryptocurrencies9
- CompanyRBGAMING N.V.
- Shuffle
-
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- Cryptocurrencies6
- CompanyNatural Nine B.V.
- Wild.io
-
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limit1,00,000 USD per week clause 9.6
- Cryptocurrencies12
- CompanyStack Gaming Ltd.
Vave
Rocketpot
Bitcasino.io
Wild Fortune
DuckDice
Empire.io
Metaspins
Rainbet
Shuffle
Wild.ioRule one: every figure with its clause
Every number printed on this site — the verification amount, the withdrawal limit — is given with the clause number it came from. That is the only reason the reader does not need to trust us: they can go to that same place in the operator's terms and see the same sentence.
Where no clause number was found, no clause is printed, even if the information was found. Wild.io's verification stance is the example: the stance was read, the clause was not found, so no clause is cited.
Rule two: a blank cell means "we did not read this"
This is the strictest rule on this site, because breaking it harms the reader directly.
When nothing is written in a cell, it means only that we did not read that information. It does not mean zero. It certainly does not mean unlimited. Reading a blank in the "withdrawal limit" cell as "no limit" is a mistake in exactly the direction where the loss falls on the reader — they plan around a large sum, and then a limit turns up in the document.
In the same way, a blank in the "coins" cell does not mean "no cryptocurrency", and a blank in the "company" cell does not mean "no company". Every time the meaning is the same: not read.
Rule three: silence is not counted in the operator's favour
The other half of this is that an operator writing nothing is not treated as an achievement.
An operator that has written no amount for verification is not called one that "does not verify" — it has no set threshold, and verification can come at any amount. One that has not written a withdrawal limit is not called "generous".
This rule applies the same way to everyone, and its real test comes when it costs our own partner. Vave is the paying partner of this site and all the cells in its row are blank, because we could not read its documents. That emptiness is printed exactly as it would be printed for anyone else.
Rule four: a licence is verified only when there is a number
Only one method of checking a licence is accepted: the number the operator states is looked up in the issuing authority's own register. A seal in a site's footer is not accepted as proof.
An operator that names an authority but gives no number stays unverified here — not "licensed". And where the number was read but its current status was not seen in the register, the status cell stays blank; that is what happened with Rocketpot.
Rule five: the Indian law part is kept separate
There are two kinds of information on this site, and they are never mixed.
The first is Indian law: the Online Gaming (Promotion and Regulation) Act, 2025 prohibits online money gaming in India, and that is why no Indian licence register exists here.
The second is the foreign operators' own documents: licence numbers, verification clauses, withdrawal limits, company names and lists of restricted countries.
Nothing in the second category changes the first. India not being named in an operator's country list is a fact about that operator's own commercial policy — it is no statement about Indian law, and on this site it is never read that way. That is why no phrase such as "legal option", "permitted" or "valid in India" will be found here for any operator.
Rule six: what will never be written here
This site does not write about how to get around any prohibition, any block or any payment-related obstacle. There is no discussion of any technical workaround. No way out of a self-exclusion is given.
Nor is there any manufactured urgency here — nothing like "limited time", "last chance" or "places are filling up" appears on this site, because lines like that are not information, they are pressure.
And there is no link here to any casino site. The single exception is the partner's advertising link, declared below.
What we did not do
This site does not play and has made no deposit. So there is no measured speed here, no figure in minutes, and no sentence of the "we tried it and saw" kind. Sites that give such figures either run checks with their own money or lift the figure from somewhere else; we do not do the first and will not do the second.
Beyond that we deliberately did not read a number of things, mentioned on the relevant pages: fee terms, the separate coin lists for deposits and withdrawals, self-exclusion clauses, companies' registration records, and how many brands run in the name of any one company. No estimate of these has been filled into the table.
Where the money comes from
This site earns from one link. It goes to Vave, it is marked as advertising, and the technical markers on it tell search engines too that it is a paid link. An account opened through it earns this site income.
That does not change the order of the table, does not change the contents of the cells, and does not change whether uncomfortable facts about the partner get written. The clearest proof of that is in the table itself: the partner's row is the emptiest row on this site. Who writes this is set out on about us.
Corrections
If a figure on this site is wrong — because an operator changed its terms, or because we read a clause wrongly — that is this site's mistake, and not a small matter. Terms keep changing, and yesterday's clause number may today cover something else.
Corrections are made where the information is printed, not hidden away in a footnote.
