About us
Who writes this site
One editor, one narrow subject and one paid link. All three are written out here, so that nobody has to guess.
Four things taken from ten operators' own documents: the jurisdiction and number of the licence, the amount above which the terms start talking about identity verification, the declared withdrawal limit, and the company in whose name the site runs. Every figure carries the clause number it came from. A blank cell means we did not read that information — not that the value is zero and not that there is no limit. None of these licences is an Indian permission; no such permission exists in India at all.
- VaveOur partner · Advertisement
-
- LicenceCuraçao No number
- Stated verification amountcase by case
- Withdrawal limitabove this 50,000 USDT in instalments clause 8.8
- Cryptocurrencies90
- CompanyTechOptions Group B.V.
- Rocketpot
-
- LicenceCuracao
- Stated verification amountUS$2,500
- Withdrawal limit5,000 USD per month clause 11.5
- Cryptocurrencies13
- CompanyDanneskjold Ventures B.V.
- Bitcasino.io
-
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Stated verification amount2,500 EUR
- Withdrawal limit10,00,000 USDT per week clause 6.10
- CryptocurrenciesWe did not read this
- CompanyMoon Technologies B.V.
- Wild Fortune
-
- LicenceAnjouan Gaming Board
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limit15,000 EUR per month clause 11.8
- Cryptocurrencies10
- CompanyMetlait SRL
- DuckDice
-
- LicenceAnjouan Gaming Board
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- Cryptocurrencies10
- CompanyZentari Limitada
- Empire.io
-
- LicenceAnjouan Gaming Board
- Stated verification amount2,000 USDT
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- CryptocurrenciesWe did not read this
- CompanyPixel Entertainment Limited
- Metaspins
-
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- Cryptocurrencies8
- Company3-102-959384 SRL
- Rainbet
-
- LicenceAnjouan Gaming Board
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- Cryptocurrencies9
- CompanyRBGAMING N.V.
- Shuffle
-
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limitWe did not read this
- Cryptocurrencies6
- CompanyNatural Nine B.V.
- Wild.io
-
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Stated verification amountWe did not read this
- Withdrawal limit1,00,000 USD per week clause 9.6
- Cryptocurrencies12
- CompanyStack Gaming Ltd.
Vave
Rocketpot
Bitcasino.io
Wild Fortune
DuckDice
Empire.io
Metaspins
Rainbet
Shuffle
Wild.ioOne subject, not a full list
This site does not compare game lists, graphics or welcome screens. It reads two kinds of document and puts them in one place.
The first is Indian law. The Online Gaming (Promotion and Regulation) Act, 2025 prohibits online money gaming in India, and one direct consequence is that no Indian licensing system exists for this category — no register, no list you could go to in order to check a claim.
The second is the terms and conditions of the foreign operators themselves, whose pages carry the licence number, the verification clause, the withdrawal limit and the company name. These are the pages almost nobody reads before depositing, although the entire route the money takes is settled there.
The subject has been kept narrow on purpose. A site that compares everything cannot compare any one thing closely enough for it to be checkable.
The editor
This site is edited by Meera Nambiar. Her work is the reading of documents: the text of the Act on one side and the operators' terms on the other, and then deciding which of the two goes into which cell and which goes into no cell at all.
No experience of any game is written here, because there is none. This site does not play and has made no deposit, and so on none of its pages will you find a measurement in minutes, an experience of any payout speed, or a sentence of the "we tried it and saw" kind. The full method, with its six rules and declared limits, is set out on how we read the terms.
How the work is done
Every figure is looked up in the operator's terms and recorded with its clause number. What was not found is recorded as "we did not read this" — not as zero, not as "unlimited", not as an estimate.
The licence number is looked up in the issuing authority's register, not read off a seal in a site's footer. An operator that names a licence but gives no number stays unverified here.
And the law part is kept separate from the operator part. India not being named in an operator's restricted-country list is a fact about its own commercial policy; it is no statement about Indian law and it is not read that way here.
Where the money comes from
From one link. It goes to Vave, it is marked as advertising, and the technical markers on it tell search engines too that it is a paid link. An account opened through it earns this site income. Vave is this site's partner and that is written on every page where it is relevant.
What does not change because of it is worth stating. The order of the table is not set by it, the contents of the cells do not change because of it, and uncomfortable facts about the partner are not removed because of it.
The most direct proof of that is in the table. Vave's row is the emptiest row on this site: its licence, verification clause, withdrawal limit, coin count and company name — all five we could not read, so all five cells are blank. The rule is the same for everyone, and a rule that does not apply to your own partner is not a rule.
Who this site is for
First, for the person who is already searching and for whom most of the material available is either advertising or written inside the pre-2025 frame. On such pages, phrases like "licensed in India" and discussions of state-by-state exceptions still turn up, and their very first word no longer fits.
Second, for the person reading out of concern for someone close, who wants to understand how this whole system works — which company it is, which licence it is, at what point documents are asked for, and over what period the money leaves.
And third, for the person who wants to check a claim. That is why a clause number is printed alongside every figure here: the reader should not have to trust this site, they should be given a route to the source.
What this site is not
This is not legal advice. The summary of the Act of 2025 given here is not a substitute for the text of the Act. In any real situation what counts is the text of the law and qualified legal advice.
This is not a recommendation to play. Nowhere on this site is it written that you should play, and nowhere is it written that any of these options is permitted in India. Online money gaming is prohibited in India; this site does not argue with that, it records it.
This is not a site that shows you routes. It will never be written here how to get around any prohibition, any block, any payment obstacle or any self-exclusion. The subject simply is not this site's.
There is no manufactured urgency here. No line such as "limited time" or "last chance" appears on this site.
If things are getting difficult
If while reading it feels as though things are going beyond your own control or someone else's, free and confidential helplines are available in India — including Tele-MANAS, KIRAN and iCall. Their numbers, and the list of signs people recognise last of all, are on risk and help.
Corrections
Terms keep changing. Yesterday's clause number may today cover something else, and an operator may change its limit or its verification amount. If a figure on this site has gone out of date, that is this site's mistake and it is fixed in the same place where it is printed — not hidden away in a footnote.
