How much can leave within one period

Four operators write down their limit

In the documents we read, four operators state their limit with a clause number.

Rocketpot writes 5,000 US dollars per month in clause 11.5.

Wild Fortune writes 15,000 euros per month in clause 11.8.

Wild.io writes 100,000 US dollars per week in clause 9.6.

Bitcasino.io writes 1,000,000 USDT per week in clause 6.10.

These four figures are the clearest information on this site, because all four have a clause. Anyone who wants to check can go to that same clause in the operator’s terms and see it — which is the whole purpose of writing a clause alongside every number on this site.

A fifth cell in the table will also look filled — Vave's — but what it holds is an instalment threshold, not a ceiling. The two are not the same thing, and the difference is set out in a separate section below.

Without reading the period there is no comparison

Now the thing that should be seen first when these four numbers are put together: their periods are not the same. Two limits are monthly and two are weekly.

The effect is large. A monthly limit and a weekly limit do not sit on the same scale, so putting two figures like 5,000 and 100,000 side by side and saying “twenty times” would be wrong — they are figures for different periods. The currencies differ too: dollars, euros and USDT are not the same thing, and on this site they are not converted into any shared currency, because converting produces a number that is written in no document. Every ceiling therefore carries its period and its currency in the crypto casinos and their payout ceilings.

So every cell in the table is printed with its own currency and its own period. That reads a little heavily, and that is right — a tidy comparison that hides the period is easier to read and is wrong.

The limits of five operators we did not read

For the other five — DuckDice, Empire.io, Metaspins, Rainbet and Shuffle — this cell is blank in the table.

That emptiness has one meaning: we did not read that information. It does not mean they have no limit, and it certainly does not mean their withdrawals are unlimited. This distinction is the strictest rule on this site, because a mistake in the other direction is tied directly to the reader’s money: if someone reads “unlimited”, plans around a large sum, and then a limit turns up in the document, the loss is not borne by whoever made the guess.

It should also be added here that an operator being blank in this cell is not a conclusion against it. The limit may well be written in their document and simply not have reached us. What was read is what is printed — that is the whole system.

A limit and an instalment are two different rules

One distinction that often gets merged, and merging it makes the comparison wrong.

A limit is a ceiling: nothing above it leaves within that period. An instalment threshold is a different thing — it is the point above which the same money does arrive, but in equal parts, split across several payments. The first rule holds the amount back; the second spreads it over time.

In this site’s table both rules are shown in the same cell, but every cell says for itself which rule it is talking about — the ceiling or the instalment. For the four operators given above, the cells state a ceiling.

Vave's cell is of the other kind, and it should be read with exactly this distinction in mind. Its clause 8.8 says that an amount above 50,000 USDT may be paid out in equal instalments over a period of up to 30 days, and the operator describes this as an exceptional case. That is not a ceiling: the amount is not held back, it is spread over time. Vave publishes no ceiling at all, so none is recorded for it on this page — and reading its cell as “unlimited” would be exactly as large a mistake as reading a blank one that way.

Clause 8.1 of the same document is worth reading alongside it: it gives up to three days for a withdrawal to be processed, and it also says that an amount larger than the payment provider’s own limit is sent in several parts. So two separate reasons for payment in pieces are recorded in that one document. This is the paying partner of this site, and both clauses are printed exactly as anyone else’s would be.

What this number does on a large win

The real effect of a ceiling shows up when a single amount exceeds it. The money does not then disappear — it spreads out over time. In the first period the amount up to the ceiling comes out, in the next period the next tranche, and the sequence continues until the remaining balance falls below the ceiling.

Which means that with an operator whose ceiling is monthly, the same amount will be spread over far longer than with one whose ceiling is weekly — even if the figure looks larger. That is why the period is never hidden on this site and never converted to any shared scale.

Two other things run alongside during that time which this cell does not account for. First, over so long a period the terms may change, and if the terms change the ceiling may change with them. Second, verification may arrive somewhere in the middle, and it brings its own delay with it.

What we did not read in this cell

For transparency it should also be recorded that some parts of this subject we did not read at all.

We did not read any operator’s minimum withdrawal amount — that is, the smallest sum below which a withdrawal cannot be made. We did not read the terms covering withdrawal fees. Nor did we read whether any bonus-related condition blocks a withdrawal at any operator, although such conditions are common in this industry.

None of these absences is counted for or against any operator, and no estimate of them has been filled into the table. What was read is what is printed.

Which gaps of this kind a reader can close from outside, and which stay shut, is listed on five checks and four blind spots.

Before this and after it

The withdrawal limit is not the last link in the chain. Before it comes identity verification, and that is the place where a withdrawal can be held up longest — the detail is on identity verification.

A limit turns an amount into a schedule, and the periods that schedule runs on are the subject of how long a payout takes.

And this whole question — how much, when and on what terms — does not change the frame of Indian law. The Online Gaming (Promotion and Regulation) Act, 2025 prohibits online money gaming in India; the limits read on this page are terms from foreign operators' own documents and have no effect on that law. The frame of the law is set out separately on what the law says.

One more thing about these limits is worth noting: not one of them is written in rupees. What the currency a limit is written in means, and what the Act says about payment, is on UPI and rupees.

How a limit interacts with the published processing periods, and why the resulting timetable cannot be stated as a single figure, is worked through in withdrawal speed.