Which cryptocurrencies are recorded, and what the count hides

What a long list does not prove

The gap between ninety and six looks very large at first glance, so it is worth writing down what does not follow from it.

A long list does not tell you the withdrawal terms are better. The coin count has no connection to the verification clause, no connection to the withdrawal limit, and certainly none to the licence. These are separate cells in the table, and they say nothing about one another. The largest count on this list is Vave’s, and Vave is the paying partner of this site — yet that same row carries no verification amount, and its licence number was missing from the operator’s own pages until the register was searched a second time on 2 September 2026. Ninety coin names were easy to find; the one number that can actually be checked took two attempts. That is as clear an example as there is of what 90 does not tell you.

Nor does a long list tell you that every coin is accepted for every purpose. In many places the deposit and withdrawal lists are different, and a coin being on the list does not settle whether money comes back in that same coin. We did not read the deposit and withdrawal lists separately for these ten operators, so that distinction is not recorded on this page — and what we did not read is not filled in here by guesswork.

A count is not the only number in this category that looks like a guarantee without being one. Five of the ten claim an arrangement that lets a player recheck a round after it has been played, and the three places that guarantee does not reach are the part the claim itself never mentions.

And one thing that is repeated more than anything else in this category but will not be found on this site: using cryptocurrency does not change any legal position. In India online money gaming is prohibited by the Online Gaming (Promotion and Regulation) Act, 2025, and that prohibition does not depend on the medium through which payment is made. There is no discussion on this site of payment routes, obstacles or alternatives to them — not here and not on any other page.

A network fee is not the operator’s fee

A technical point, which often gets tangled while reading a list of coins.

When an amount is sent over a blockchain, that network charges its own fee. The operator does not set that fee; it depends on how busy the network is at the time and on the network chosen, which is why sending the same amount in different coins costs different amounts.

Beyond that, the operator may have a fee of its own, and it is written in its terms. We did not read the fee terms for these ten operators, so there is no fee figure anywhere on this site. A figure we did not read is not written here just to make the page look complete.

The two things that go wrong while reading a list

First, one coin can exist on several networks. USDT is the commonest example: the same token exists on different chains, and the network chosen for sending changes both the cost and whether it arrives. “USDT” written on a list does not tell you which networks are accepted; that information is written elsewhere, and we did not read it for these ten operators.

Second, the definition of the count is not the same everywhere. One operator counts every token separately, another treats several forms of the same token as one. So the difference between 13 and 12 is not as clean as it looks, and on this site these counts are not read as an order or a ranking — they are simply the figures found in the documents.

The other cells in the table

The coin count is the lightest cell in the table — it tells you how the site works but says nothing about the route the money takes. The two real turns on that route are on identity verification and withdrawal limits.

And the question of which company is behind the site — the only real party there is in a dispute — can be looked at on who the company is.

One thing this list never says: which coin is taken on which chain. Names like USDT live under one ticker on several different networks, and counting names settles nothing there — that distinction is opened up on networks and fees.